Authors Posts by Paul Sutliff

Paul Sutliff

Paul Sutliff
Paul is the author of Stealth Jihad Phase 2: Infiltrate American Colleges. Paul has been on WYSL and the Radio Jihad Network an educational informational network of shows on Blog Talk Radio. Paul's research has been appreciated by P. David Gaubatz, author of Muslim Mafia and Ryan Mauro, of the Clarion Project. But Paul does more than write, he travels and speaks to groups about his concerns.

Screen Shot of ISIS in Mosul courtesy of MEMRITV
Screen Shot of ISIS in Mosul courtesy of MEMRITV
Screen Shot of ISIS in Mosul courtesy of MEMRITV

In June 2013, Operation Eager Lion involving 8,000 personnel from 19 countries was underway in Jordan during the Syrian civil war. Some have claimed this was to cover the 900 men left to train the future group known today as ISIS. As far back as February 2012, WND reported that the U.S. was training Syrian opposition forces. WND reported this week that, “members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIS, were trained in 2012 by U.S. instructors working at a secret base in Jordan, according to informed Jordanian officials.” WND is not alone in making these claims that are largely silenced in the U.S. Reuters noticed that the German weekly Der Spiegel had stated that “Americans are training Syrian anti-government fighters in Jordan.”

Has President Obama orchestrated the fall of Iraq? What purpose does recruiting Iran to assist serve if this is true?

Keep in mind that Iran is mainly Shi’ite and Iraq is mainly Sunni. Normally these two Muslim factions are at each other’s throats. But, Iran is actively funding Hamas activities. The Hamas are the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood are Sunni.

According to WND, Mohammad Ali Sobhani, a former Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, “Hamas has played a vital role in the Palestinian resistance movement in the past and will continue to play the same role in the future.” Hamas recently suffered being cut off from Egypt’s government funds. Iranian influx of funding will allow it to continue at the same strength.

Enter President Obama recruiting Iran to assist or take an active role in Iraq’s stabilization. Is this a long gamble by President Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood to establish Sunni dominance?

The Islamist State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) is appealing to Muslims around the world to join them. CBC reported that Canadian Muslims in their 20s, such as Farah Mohamed Shirdon has joined up with ISIS, and according to a video ISIS posted Shirdon issued a threat to Canada, the U.S. and all oppressors. “We are coming and we will destroy you by the will of God.” Fox News covered this same issue this week in their article, “Somali-Americans leave homes, friends in Minnesota to fight alongside ISIS jihadis.”

The Counter Jihad Report explains how they are attracting recruits from Western countries:

As a terror group, Isis is at the forefront of media technology in its bid for new recruits and even developed an app called “Dawn of glad tidings” through Google Play for Android phones.

Once downloaded, the app effectively hijacked the phone to distribute official Isis tweets and images to Twitter accounts, according to Channel 4 News.

It was sophisticated enough to get around most spam detectors and was designed to have its messages Trending on Twitter.

It was finally stopped when Google took it down.

Followers have also used other social media websites like Ask-fm to provide tips and advice on how to join the fight.

In its 400-page annual report for 2013, Isis claimed to have carried out more than 7,600 operations in Iraq, including 1,000 assassinations and planting more than 4,400 roadside bombs.

It also claims to have assassinated 1,083 people and conducted 607 mortar attacks.

Like any corporate document, it uses computer-generated graphics and lists its targets and performance – but in relation to death and carnage.

Who is ISIS submitting a 400-page report to? Is it to the Muslim Brotherhood? Is it to the U.S. trainers in Jordan? Is Iran being recruited to assist against ISIS or is it being led to slaughter?`

If ISIS is trained by U.S. special forces and has established worldwide recruitment tools for young Muslims to join the jihad, it is possible the end game is the unification of Iraq, Syria and Iran after establishing the Caliphate. Who is responsible for the U.S. training terrorists if not the Commander-in-Chief?

Iranian Shi’ites may be courted by Sunnis for cash and arms but are they prepared to fight an all out battle for their very existence? Note that “Sheik Youssef al-Qaradawi urged Arab and Islamic states this Thursday to protect Sunni Muslims in Iraq.”  Why not protect the Shi’ites? Is this an open declaration of jihad on Shi’ites in Iraq? Is this why Obama is encouraging Iran to take a lead in Iraq?

Time will provide the answers, but will America be safe under a president that engages the military in training terrorists to establish the caliphate?

0 718
Rochester NY - where FBI foiled a terrorist plot to murder US Citizens | PHOTO CREDIT: Wiki Commons
Rochester NY - where FBI foiled a terrorist plot to murder US Citizens | PHOTO CREDIT: Wiki Commons

FBI foils terrorist plot by Yemen-born Mufid A. Elfgeeh, a naturalized American citizen, to assassinate returning US Military personnel

Rochester NY - where FBI foiled a terrorist plot to murder US Citizens | PHOTO CREDIT: Wiki Commons
Rochester NY – where FBI foiled a terrorist plot to murder US Citizens | PHOTO CREDIT: Wiki Commons

ROCHESTER, NY, June 2, 2014 — Mufid A. Elfgeeh, a naturalized American citizen from Yemen, was arrested for criminal possession of an unregistered firearm silencer on Saturday. Mufid was caught thanks to the FBI implementing a sting at the Hudson Walmart in Rochester, NY.

US Attorney William J. Hochul stated:

In a post 9/11 world, law enforcement takes very seriously any potential threat against the safety and security of our country. This defendant, on multiple occasions stated his desire and intention to harm and kill American soldiers, as well as his allegiance to terrorist groups whose mission it is to bring devastation upon our country.

According to US Attorneys Brett A. Harvey and Frank H. Sherman, this sting was the result of an investigation into tweets and past public statements by Elfgeeh that he was looking to buy a bullet-proof vest, guns and, ammunition in order to go on a shooting spree. Elfgeeh’s intention was to target US soldiers as they return home “to deter them by any means” from returning to battle. According to Harvey and Sherman, Elfgeeh had planned to commit between 5 and 20 shooting incidents using the silencer. Elfgeeh had planned to video each event as it took place and claim responsibility for the results.

Elfgeeh paid an FBI source $1050 in February two handguns and two firearm silencers along with ammunition for the weapons. May 31st at the Hudson Walmart in Rochester, NY Elfgeeh was arrested after taking possession of the items by members of the Joint Terrorism Task Force. Mufid Elgeeh made an appearance June 2, before the U.S. Magistrate Judge and is being held awaiting a detention hearing on June 16.

0 452
truth about benghazi
Benghazi attack tape | Image Credit:
truth about benghazi
Benghazi attack tape | Image Credit:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) gave the latest rant against the American people becoming informed on why they were lied to on Sept. 12, 2012:

“I haven’t seen it, but I will say this again–diversion, subterfuge–Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Why aren’t we talking about something else?” Pelosi said in response to a question from Breitbart News. “What I know of what I’ve read in the press about the emails was what was put out there before. I don’t think there was anything new there.”

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), also an outspoken person on this topic, has coordinated talking points with Pelosi. Cummings has labeled the Benghazi investigation a Republican campaign strategy. In other words, he is calling it a diversion from what is really happening. This is important to understand because it implies they are loudly saying what someone else has written for them to say.

Recent revelations on Democratic talking points being used to create illegal campaign commercials have shown that Democrats are able to communicate quickly and clearly on a message sent from someplace. But what is the purpose of calling Benghazi a diversion? Why are Cummings and Pelosi using the same language?

Perhaps it is time to lay all the cards on the table. Let’s have all the major media outlets cover what has been learned through the investigation and what–if any–roadblocks the investigation has faced. Roadblocks are placed to stop investigators from learning something. What is it that the White House and the State Department do not want the American people to learn?

One of the most interesting pieces of information was revealed a week ago when Obama spokesperson and former National Security Council Communications Director Tommy Vietor said on Fox News that “Obama was not in the Situation Room.” Upon being asked, he stated he never saw him there. Yet the questions as to where President Obama was and what he did were among the first questions asked by the American people. The information our president relayed through his designee Susan Rice was found to be entirely false and a lie perpetrated on the American people. What is so important about the investigation into Benghazi that has ranking Democrats so scared that they are making public declarations against learning more?

There are two possible answers to this question. Neither is good and neither makes the Democratic Party look good.

1) The Obama White House is actively working with terrorists.

One of the most damning revelations from the recently released emails was that some people have been given security clearance high enough to work with the White House but should not have been due to evidence that they have been actively working with an organization that has sworn to “destroy western civilization from within and by their own hand.”

The purpose of having persons that work with the president to obtain security clearances is to protect the president and the American people. Terrorists have had access to three past presidents: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama have all posed for pictures with convicted terrorist Alamoudi.

President Obama has knowingly appointed six members of the Muslim Brotherhood to sensitive posts in the Executive Branch. These members were named in an Egyptian paper. Of the six, one has shown he is an active member of the Muslim Brotherhood. The FBI has taken no corrective action. Perhaps this is the reason for changing their mission.

2) The Obama White House is taking direction from terrorists.

But what is scarier and may be revealed by more information is that the Executive Branch of the American government actively worked with terrorists to create a kidnapping to release the Blind Sheik that former Egyptian President Morsi requested of President Obama.

Two to three months before the attack on Benghazi, conservatives were discussing a rumor that our president had arranged for a kidnapping of an ambassador so that he could hand over the Blind Sheik to the Muslim Brotherhood. The Sept. 11, 2012 email released recently showed that sources in the White House were taking talking points from a Muslim Brotherhood news source, Al Jazeera. The Al Jazeera report claims that the attack on the embassy in Cairo was about a video. However, no interview of any participant was given. In addition, no poster or placard was shown indicating that this was the reason for the protest. The Associated Press also coordinated their news story using no interviews of participants. This is unheard of because AP requires further investigation. This would reveal that there was never any protest about a video.

What is known about the protest that news sources like AP, CBS, ABC, and CNN have silenced is that the Cairo protest was never about a video. Pat Dollard put it this way:

In the weeks before September 11, 2012, these jihadists plotted to attack the U.S. embassy in Cairo. In fact, the Blind Sheikh’s son threatened a 1979 Iran-style raid on the embassy: Americans would be taken hostage to ransom for the Blind Sheikh’s release from American prison (he is serving a life sentence). Other jihadists threatened to burn the embassy to the ground — a threat that was reported in the Egyptian press the day before the September 11 ‘protests.’

This is what the Democratic Party fears: that the American people will realize that not only did their president lie to them about a video, but he conspired with presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton to lie about its cause. Because then Americans would ask, “Why did you lie about this? Why did you have to hide the truth about Benghazi? Is it really because what conservatives have been telling us is true? Is it because Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama were engaged in gun-running to our sworn enemy Al-Qaeda?”

This is why the American people have demanded the Select Committee from House Speaker John Boehner.

Credit: Wiki Commons
Credit: Wiki Commons
IMAGE CREDIT: Wiki Commons

Tehran, Iran, May 15, 2014 — President of Iran, Hassan Rouhani  made a public statement on Sunday at the unveiling of three new nuclear projects.  President Rouhani  was asked about  the past 20 years of secrecy in developing nuclear bomb capability. His response was, “Were we supposed to inform you of the building of centrifuges? … based on which law we should have informed you about these activities.”

Iran has a history of hiding and obfuscating indicators from those who investigate Iran’s nuclear capabilities.  Secretary of State John Kerry claimed the attitude is new. Kerry stated that Bush was offered a deal to reduce or slow production in 2003 in the form of a letter. A letter that arrived via the Swiss Ambassador to Tehran, Tim Guldmann. It had no official letter head, but offered to discuss Iran’s quest for a nuclear weapon. No evidence existed outside of the courier that the letter was genuine. The Bush administration believed that this letter arrived due to the invasion of Iraq and fear Iran would be next.

Iran revealed that they were acting deceitfully in 2003 on this issue on August 4, 2005. The Iranian chief negotiator on nuclear affairs, and member of the Iranian Supreme Council for National Security Hosein Musavian  in 2003, the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) insisted that they shut down the uranium enrichment project in 2003. In 2003, the Iranians were 1 year away from completing the Esfahan project. The IAEA gave Iran a 50- day extension to suspend all uranium enrichment, which is what is required for a nuclear device. But Iran knew debating with Europe would give them a year’s extension which they were granted. This gave them time to complete the Esfahan project.

Iran had learned the dangers of non-compliance with the IAEA with Iraq’s first invasion by allied forces under President George H. W. Bush in 1990. They donned a cloak of diplomacy and through negotiations delayed any compliance to suspending production of enriched uranium long enough to complete the project underway.

Iran may now be capable of creating a nuclear bomb. In 2008, IAEA Director-General Dr. Muhammad El-Baradei stated that Iran could produce “enough enriched uranium for a nuclear bomb in six months to a year.” Six year have passed and no one has attempted to slow Iran from gaining the nuclear bomb.

The purpose of the additional three nuclear projects may seem benevolent. However, Iran’s nuclear weapons program is likely the real intent. Iran has made several threats against her enemies.  It is likely that the nuclear program is to create and weaponize nuclear elements that will be aimed at their declared enemies — America and Israel.

Wiki Commons Photo by Faris Knight

Egypt issues mass death sentences. Those sentenced today were facing charges that they attacked a police station in Adawa.

Minya, Egypt April 28, 2014 — Egypt issues mass death sentences for a second time within two months. 683 supporters and/members of the Muslim Brotherhood were issued death sentences. Amongst those sentenced is the Muslim Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie.

Those sentenced today were facing charges that they attacked a police station in Adawa, near Minya last year.

Wiki Commons Photo by Faris Knight
Wiki Commons Photo by Faris Knight

Major media outlets are clamoring for opinions that condemn the mass death sentences, before fully explaining that the judicial process is not the same as we have in the states. News media that uses members of the Strong Egypt Party are being sought after for comment as it is the political party created by the Muslim Brotherhood as they started to take power in Egypt.

Seeking opinions from this organization may also be seeking like mindedness with those whom Egypt’s government has declared terrorists. Past presidential candidate, Abdel-Moneim Abul-Fotouh, was quick to insert his comments, declaring to the media that all three verdicts – given “without evidence or eye witnesses or hearings or interrogation.”

Those who are in custody were interrogated. Those on the list of names that were sentenced today and are in hiding have to turn themselves in to the police in order to appeal the verdict against them.

Another source that major media outlets are turning to is the Salafist Nour Party. This party was a supporter of Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood until it was evident that Morsi would be removed from office. Nour Party leading member Talaat Marzouk has commented that he believes the verdict should be adjusted to avoid a negative image for Egypt.

As stated earlier the Egyptian court system is different than in the United States. In March the same court issued a death sentence for 529 of the Muslim Brotherhood, the same court that issued the sentence after having issued the sentence and having the Grand Mufti review the sentence, lowered the death sentence for 492 of those were convicted and upheld the death sentence for 37 defendants.

Media who are seeking comments from those sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood is an action that may likely be seen by Egyptian government personnel as seeking to promote terrorism.

2 624
Source for hood: Wiki Commons. Hulsey Photo via
Source for hood: Wiki Commons. Hulsey Photo via
Source for hood: Wiki Commons. Hulsey Photo via

Wisconsin Assemblyman Brett Hulsey (Madison) is a gubernatorial candidate and the latest Democratic political figure to call all Republicans racist. What is different is that Assemblyman Hulsey stated he intended to hand out KKK hoods to Republicans attending their state convention this weekend. The added attention Hulsey sought created enough pressure to cause him to not follow through.

Of special note is that Hulsey calls the hoods “Republican Party hats.” Even Brett Hulsey’s own party distanced themselves from this action when Wisconsin Democratic Party chairman Mike Tate stated that “this type of behavior has no place in public dialogue.”

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Hulsey took great pride in displaying the hoods at his press conference on Thursday where he stated enthusiastically that he sewed them himself.

Historically, Ku Klux Klan members were Democrats. records that Republican policies after the Civil War were “aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks.” This highly reputable site on American history also records that “the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.”

Assemblyman Brett Husley did get a lot of attention from his mention of the Ku Klux Klan and Republican conservatives are capitalizing on it as a teachable moment to inform the public about the ties of the Democratic Party to what is often described today as America’s oldest homegrown terrorist network, the KKK. Among those leading the way educating America’s Democrats about their historical ties to the Ku Klux Klan are the US Finance Post , the National Black Republicans and the American Thinker.

Image Credit: WikiCommons
Image Credit: WikiCommons

Last week my friend Jim drove us to Corning, N.Y. to do a presentation. We got there about 45 minutes early and stopped to get a bite to eat. The wonderful diner we stopped in had character and great food. We chose to sit where we could watch the two big screen TVs on CNN. For the entire time we were there CNN covered the “missing plane” or rather the PING found in the ocean.

As we listened to them say the same thing over and over we started to laugh. CNN had recorded the Aussie Navy and others saying they were waiting for the box to stop pinging so they could send a sub down the next week. I turned to Jim and asked what he thought about waiting a week to lose the locator ping. We both agreed the purpose was not to find the “missing plane.”

After listening to CNN, I came up with a prediction that could be way off: “CNN is going to be responsible for discovering the PING fish.” They have invested more time and money into this search than Benghazi, the IRS Scandal, the Birth Certificate issue, and Fast and Furious combined. They have to discover something from the search—it will be a fish that goes “PING!”

One week later they are searching for the “PING fish” now with the use of submersibles.

When people ask me my thoughts on this “missing plane” I remind of them of basic pieces that first came out on CNN. One was that the cellphones were still on. Okay people, that means the plane landed. It makes the generals who have made statements that the plane is possibly in Pakistan being prepped with a dirty bomb 100 percent more likely. Cellphones don’t work underwater. I know because my last cellphone tried swimming and never gave another smiling screen or ring again.

Simple logic dictates that we must ask why CNN is covering the “PING fish” hunt so extensively. The answer is in what they are not reporting. Simple review of Brenner Brief News for the last week pulls up some pretty important news items totally ignored by CNN as it hunts for the elusive “PING fish.”

When the media acts as a propaganda tool by covering political events to deliver a predetermined message or purposefully hides issues from the people to avoid reporting a negative story against a politician, the security of the American people is threatened. Be wary my friends of those who seek to report for hours each day on an elusive “ping.” Look elsewhere to find what stories they are avoiding reporting so your safety and the safety of all Americans is not threatened.

3 766
Secretary-General of USCMO Oussama Jammal at the press conference.

On March 12, several Muslim groups formed the US Council of Muslim Organizations. All of these groups are recognized as members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The founding members are:USCMO

  • Muslim American Society (MAS)
  • Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)
  • Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
  • The Mosque Cares (Ministry of Imam W. Deen Mohammed)
  • American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
  • Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA)
  • Muslim Ummah of North America (MUNA)
  • Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA)

Newly joined organizations are:

  • American Muslim Alliance (AMA)
  • The Mosque Foundation (Chicago)

USCMO is just another newly formed umbrella group of the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA. This is not the first time many Muslim groups have unified as one. Muslim Brotherhood entities were under the Safa Trust/SAAR Network. Operation Greenquest led by customs agent David Kane revealed much on this group.  After the light shone too brightly the group funds left the country into what was described as a “black hole.”

Secretary-General Oussama Jammal stated that the first project of the USCMO is to complete a census of all Muslims to create a database that will be used for political purposes. This project is not new. CAIR along with its sister organizations, ISNA, ICNA, MAS, and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) undertook such a project and announced it in 2008. In 2012, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) joined CAIR in their efforts to create an American Muslim database pooling their information.

CAIR and MPAC have used the compiled data to promote Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 and other candidates like Keith Ellison.

Mazen Mokhter, Executive Director of MAS, said at the press conference that they organized for Muslims “to have deep and lasting impact on society, a deep and lasting positive impact on society, on Muslims and people of other faiths.” Osama Abuirshaid of AMP stated USCMO would enable Muslims to impact foreign and domestic policy of the United States.

USCMO is not a political party as has been erroneously reported by,, and Tea Party News Network. Regardless of what they stated at their press conference on March 12th they did not file any paperwork with the Federal Election Committee to declare USCMO a PAC fund, a lobbyist group or a political party as of the date this article was published. Writing that the USCMO is a newly formed political party without checking to see if the group is telling the truth does a disservice to our readers.

Note that in the press release they stated they were not going to work with local elections since they were a national group. This leaves the FEC as the sole party they need to file with. But things are much worse. USCMO does not have an address. It is not found on their site. None was given at the press conference. Without this they cannot incorporate and only exist in the sense that they are non-legal entity. Why would any Muslim put their faith in a group that won’t share their address?

However, what is important to note is that while the news sources listed above are in error stating a Muslim political party has been formed, the erroneous reporting is not to be blamed solely on them. Nihad Awad and others did talk about USCMO as if they wanted it to be a political party. But, it is possible they were simply practicing taqiyya in their discussion with the media. One Islamic site states this about taqiyya:

The word “al-Taqiyya” literally means: “Concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.” A one-word translation would be “Dissimulation.” (al-Taqiyya/Dissimulation, Part I).

Taqiyya, then is the Islamic belief that is ok to lie about your faith.  The reason taqiyya is discussed here at all is the simple fact that USCMO has not applied to be anything political at all, yet they announced that this was their intention. Does USCMO have other unstated political objectives? Is getting the U.S. to accept sharia as the law of the land their primary objective?  This would make their discussion calling USCMO a political group entirely true and not require them to register with the FEC.

But, organizing for the purpose of implementing sharia in the United States would make this a group that exists for the purpose of subverting the Constitution. For many Muslims who want sharia, this would be all they need to know to endorse the political nature of the organization.

PHOTO CREDIT: Modified from White House file photo, public domain
PHOTO CREDIT: Modified from White House file photo, public domain


PHOTO CREDIT: Modified from White House file photo, public domain
PHOTO CREDIT: Modified from White House file photo, public domain

From the fly on the wall  in Saudi Arabia during President Obama’s visit.

Buzzz—I was flying around and listening to the King speak to this Obama person, when BUZZ –the king starts shouting.  

*     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *

King: You arrogant fool! {punching a hole in a wall} You idiot! Wasn’t my declaration that the Muslim Brotherhood are a terrorist group enough to tell you that you are not welcome here?? Do you think I don’t read Arabic? Do you think Asisi and I do not talk? I know who you are!

Obama: You know who I am, do you. I am the President of the United States. My power is extensive. I can order drone strikes anywhere.

King: If you think to scare me you fool, be very afraid. How would the American people react to seeing your membership papers.

Obama: What you’re talking about doesn’t exist. (shaking a little)

King: You can thank your fellow ikhwan in Indonesia for recording the event in and quickly sharing with Cairo. Average Americans like Paul Sutliff of Brief News are aware of what you are doing and who you are. Maybe I should share with him what I have on you.

But for now – [a twinkle appears in the king’s eyes.] I will settle for seeing you run like a scared rabbit out of here — unless you want to see me obey the law and detain a certain Ikhwan member for 30 years. You chose, you can stay and spend 30 years in jail or you can go and do more damage to America if you get out of my country before I lose my temper.

*     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *     *    *     *

BUzzzz — I never saw a president run so fast before. He didn’t even stay for dinner. 

Fiction can mirror reality.

1) President Obama did leave much earlier than planned as State Department sites had reported he would be attending a dinner.  They have had the item scrubbed.

2) According to a Saudi print of the interaction Obama did discuss Egypt with King Abdullah.

3) An Egyptian paper Al-Wafd ran an article in 2013 stating President Obama has been a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Since Egypt and the Saudis have been talking,  Saudi Arabia royalty has gone from being a major source of funds for the Muslim Brotherhood initiatives to a stop-gate.

muslim brotherhood

LONDON, April 2, 2014 — David Cameron, the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, has just ordered a full investigation into the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities in the UK.

Prime Minister Cameron’s press conference yesterday revealed an investigation into the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood:

We are opposed to extremism. We want to challenge the extremist narrative. What I think is important about the Muslim Brotherhood is to make sure we fully understand what this organization is, what it stands for, what its links are, what its beliefs are in terms of extremism and violent extremism, what its connections are with other groups, what its presence is here in the United Kingdom. Our policy should be informed by a complete picture of that knowledge and that is why I have commissioned this piece of work by a very experienced senior ambassador John Jenkins who is our Ambassador in Saudi Arabia.

Interestingly, Ambassador Jenkins will find he has little work if any to do at all. Extensive work on the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK has been compiled by Ian Johnson, Walid Shoebat, and the English Defence League.

A simple search for the Muslim Brotherhood revels their motto, which was restated by Dr. Morsi before he became the President of Egypt on May 12, 2012:

Hasan Al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, wrote the motto for the Muslim Brotherhood:

Allah is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.

Ian Johnson‘s 2011 book,  A Mosque in Munich: Nazis, the CIA, and the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the West has compiled most of the research Ambassador Jenkins needs and should consult him.

In retrospect it is important to ask, how is it possible that David Cameron, Prime Minister of the UK, is unaware of the Muslim Brotherhood’s motto and its extremist nature? He should also be asked as should previous Prime Ministers of the UK why they have not investigated the Muslim Brotherhood before. Lastly, why did he wait until being pressed by Saudi Arabia and Egypt to pursue an investigation of the Muslim Brotherhood?


muslim brotherhood trials

CAIRO, March 25, 2014 – Today began the Muslim Brotherhood trials for 682 members, including Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie, 70. The same court that tried, convicted and sentenced in absentia 529 members of the Muslim Brotherhood to death is presiding over this case.

muslim brotherhood trials
Mohamed Badie caged in court.

Major news sources who are covering this story are treating it as an absolute horror. CNN is even distorting facts, claiming that hundreds of the Muslim Brotherhood were shot by soldiers while doing a sit-in. CNN ignored that the ikhwan had set up battlements and possessed weapons. CNN’s reporting has been so biased that it took part in hiding large anti-Obama signs displayed by the anti-Morsi protestors in the days before Morsi’s ouster by the military.

In addition, this writer spoke with one Egyptian on the ground in Cairo that first night who revealed it was likely that those who were killed did not have battle wounds. They were shot once in the head or once in the chest, leaving many more questions.

The one prominent name the media know in this latest case is Mohamed Badie. It should be expected then that they would publish a review of what and who Mohamed Badie is along with past public statements. CNN and other major news networks have access to a plethora of his speeches and, thanks to places like, translations of his material can be found.

Mohamed Badie stated that the Muslim Brotherhood would form a “Free Egyptian Army,” implying that he was influential enough to spilt the Egyptian Army into chaos. This statement alone in many countries could be enough to charge him with sedition and–if he acted on it–treason.

In December 2012, Mohamed Badie was featured in The Times of Israel as having been identified by the Simon Wiesenthal Center for producing the worst anti-Semitic and anti-Israel slurs that year. They quoted Badie as having “lamented ‘Jewish control’ and ‘spreading of corruption on earth,’ and recommended ‘holy Jihad’ as a remedy.” As recently as October 11, 2012 Mohammad Badie was recorded by AFP as having said:

Jerusalem is Islamic… and nobody is entitled to make concessions… The jihad for the recovery of Jerusalem is a duty for all Muslims, [stressing that the liberation of the Holy City] will not be done through negotiations or at the United Nations.

These quotes reveal how much CNN and other major media news outlets work to hide the true character of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Today the defense lawyers boycotted the court session for which 60 members of the Muslim Brotherhood were present. Adel Ali, who said he was a member of the defense team, stated to Reuters, “We refrained from attending… because the judge has violated criminal law procedures and did not allow the (lawyers) to present their defense.” Amusingly this statement presumed an action of censorship and a denial of rights. What did happen today was that their case was rescheduled for April 28.

What will happen on April 28 is entirely on the rule of law in Egypt. If Badie is the example all Muslim Brotherhood members should aspire to, what does this say about the ikhwan as a whole? Is this why the Egyptian courts see no other alternative than issuing a death sentence?

1 549

WASHINGTON, March 17, 2014  — This past Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) announced that the federal government is getting out of supervisory control of the Internet next year. This means that President Obama plans to give up Internet control.

The U.S. government originally created the Internet as a communication tool for its military. The Department of Defense’s Advance Research Projects Agency (DARPA) originally created the Internet by linking together networks and government agencies in the 1960s and ‘70s. The network of networks became known as the Internet and the rules that govern the system allowing the networks to communicate amongst each other became known as Internet Protocols (IPs).

IP addresses are numerical addresses that serve as routing addresses. The Domestic Name Service (DNS) translates IP numbers into common, easy to remember names for sites. To access this site you type in; that is the DNS for the IP address.

According to the press release by the NTIA on July 1, 1997,  President Bill Clinton ordered the NTIA to pursue privatization of supervisory control of the Internet to increase “competition and facilitate international participation in its management.” President Clinton did not direct the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to pursue handing off DNS to the United Nations. He spoke of private enterprise possibly doing a better job.

Bush administration State Department senior advisor Christian Whiton critiqued this decision when he told The Daily Caller, “This is the Obama equivalent of Carter’s decision to give away the Panama Canal — only with possibly much worse consequences.”

The Daily Caller spoke of ICANN’s growing consideration of opening an office in Geneva, which is second only to New York City as a United Nations presence. This writer spoke to many knowledgeable people on this topic and discovered they considered the action of handing off control of DNS to be an infrastructure risk to America.

2 731
obama saudi arabia visit

President Obama is scheduled for genuflecting in Saudi Arabia later this month. In case you are wondering about my choice of words, take a few moments to reflect on President Obama’s deep bow of servitude to King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. But, will President Obama visit a country that has declared his friends terrorists?

President Obama has stood with the Muslim Brotherhood from the days of his candidacy when he sent a team to meet with the Hamas who are the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2012 President Obama not only stood behind the Muslim Brotherhood coming to power in Egypt, he facilitated their legitimacy in a country where they had been declared an illegal entity.

Last Wednesday, Saudi Arabia pulled their ambassador from Qatar because Qatar’s Emir Shaikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani openly avowed statements that he has a “duty” to support the Muslim Brotherhood. Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) joined the Saudis by removing their ambassadors from Qatar also. These stands against the Muslim Brotherhood are significant.

Now, will President Obama go to Saudi Arabia, a country that has Arabic for its language and has probably read the Egyptian Al-Wafd article that accused President Barack Hussein Obama of being a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood back in September of last year? His presence may put him at risk of serving a 30-year sentence in Saudi Arabia if they have the document alleged to exist by the Al-Wafd.

If Obama is a “secret member” of the Muslim Brotherhood, you would expect him to be following the directions given by the North American Muslim Brotherhood in their Explanatory Memorandum written back in 1991 and discovered hidden in a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s sub-basement. Translated from Arabic into English, one paragraph reads:

4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America:

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

The phrase “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers” must be considered if President Obama is in truth a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Special consideration into his actions since becoming president would require taking a broader look to see if he saw his actions as being beneficial to America in the long run or being destructive.

Don’t forget President Obama has personally appointed six members of the Muslim Brotherhood into positions of power in the Executive Branch. Among them is Mohammed Elibiary, who was appointed by Obama to serve on the Homeland Security Advisory Council. Elibiary has used Muslim Brotherhood symbols declaring himself openly to be a member of the Ikhwan. Interestingly Obama had Elibiary on a committee that discussed whether or not to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group. Doesn’t that sound like a clear cut case of “conflict of interest?”

I predict that Obama will have a golf emergency or need to be someplace else on the date arranged. Would you risk what would be a life sentence if accusations existed against you in another country?

Police often ask the people who run from them why they did it. If you ask the police why they think someone ran or avoided them, they will say they are guilty of something. If President Obama avoids going to Saudi Arabia, Americans everywhere must consider why he chose not to go.

2 499
operation american spring

Operation American Spring is a grassroots movement unique in that people through various contacts–be it through social media or otherwise–have bonded together into leadership groups from various states. Their mission statement can be found on their website. This group hopes to gather three percent of the nation’s population (10 million people) in Washington, DC on May 16th and intends for at least one million people to stay in the DC area and be visible until the federal government returns to following the Constitution.

Norman Wahner, one of the grassroots leaders of Pennsylvania, said, “We have got to end the corruption in DC. They are occupying this place that was once the capital of the free world.” He believes every American citizen has a duty to stop the corruption and preserve the Constitution.

Charles Sulser of Virginia considers himself a simple man and looks at Operation American Spring in a simple way. He said:

This is not about Barack Obama. He just happens to be the president. The problem is still going to be there when he leaves. It is about a government and individuals knowingly and willfully disregarding the Constitution. They are sworn to uphold this document but they are criminally avoiding their duty. We are dealing with lawless representatives. They are not representing the people. Don’t ask me who they are representing, I don’t know and I don’t care. What I know is they are not representing the American people and that needs to change. I call it tyranny house cleaning.

Colonel Harry Riley (retired) is seen as the main leader of the group. He emphasized, as did each of the leaders, that OAS will be an example of a “non-violent, peaceful (presentation of grievances against the federal government) with no intention of doing anything outside of the law.” Col. Riley sees the country as being in a state of chaos because the federal government is not following the Constitution. He cited recent words from Attorney General Eric Holder about choosing what laws to enforce and how that goes against his oath of office.

It is important to note that OAS leadership is multiracial. One of OAS’s leadership is Mrs. Otillia Krapff, who speaks proudly of her Apache ancestry. Mrs. Krapff is also a veteran of the Vietnam War, and is the founder of the Constitutional Party in Nevada. Mrs. Krapff considers herself little more than a patriot who loves her country and wants the federal government to return to following the Constitution. She said, “We are all Americans. We were not born with the labels ‘Democratic’ or ‘Republican’ on our foreheads.” Mrs. Krapff offered to assist groups with the logistics of planning to partake in Operation American Spring.

Sylvester Brand is a black pastor from Illinois who worked for his local utility company for 30 years. He explained how he discovered Operation American Spring on the Internet and how it has affected his walk with Christ in a positive manner. Pastor Brand believes that on May 16, “the whole country will be riveted” as they see the crowds in DC and learn the purpose of Operation American Spring. They “will be forced to rethink every position they have held regarding politics, religion and what they thought was truly important.”

This group is highly efficient and very organized. It may set the standard on how to mobilize from a grassroots movement to a national swarm on DC. Many of those committed to going to DC on May 16 have already organized into tightly knit groups from those in Tea Parties, churches and veterans groups just to name a few.

Some rumors regarding Operation American Spring have emerged, including one stating that this is a military action where officials will be forcefully removed from office. However, Operation American Spring seeks to follow the law and will do all in their power to make sure the law and order is maintained amongst the 10 million people they are hoping to flood Washington, DC with on May 16.

Will 10 million people show on May 16? We will have to wait and see. Will Operation American Spring be large enough that the major media networks covers their presence in DC?

One thing is for sure: the leadership of this group is determined to show the world that American people can take back their government through peaceful, lawful means, and many of them believe that God is leading them. This group may be seen as copiers of the Occupy Wall Street movement, but they will not be staying in tents on the mall without permission. Also unlike the OWS movement, Operation American Spring intends to leave DC cleaner than they find it by cleaning up after themselves and others while cleaning the lawlessness out of the federal government.

muslim brotherhood terrorists

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, March 9, 2014 — The Saudi Arabian government has formally declared the Muslim Brotherhood to be a terrorist group. This action makes them align with Egypt’s declaration against the Muslim Brotherhood on December 25, 2013.

Royal Order 16820 of the Saudi government signed by King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud on March 7, takes effect on March 9.

This action was begun by the Ministry of the Interior submitting a list of terrorist groups and further definitions of what the Saudi government declares to be terrorism. According to Asharq Al-Awsat, the Saudis listed the following as terrorist groups: “Al-Qaida Organization – Al-Qaida Organization in the Arabian Peninsula – Al-Qaida Organization in Yemen – Al-Qaida Organization in Iraq – Al-Nusra Front – Hezbollah in the Kingdom – the Muslim Brotherhood – The Houthi Group.”

Also notable in Saudi Royal Order 16820 is a declaration including “any similar organizations with similar ideologies, discourses, and actions along with all those groups and factions noted on the lists of the Security Council and international bodies and are identified as terroristic and committed to violence.”

Absent from the decree is a statement declaring the penalty for colluding with terrorists identified by the decree. Royal Order 16820 does refer to penalties that are enforced at present but does not name what they are.

King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud’s decree also condemns the Iranian terrorist groups Hezbollah and ISIS. In addition, this order specifically lists groups that have held a presence in Saudi Arabia.

When this Royal Order becomes enforceable, the world will be watching to see if members of the Saudi family and other Saudis who have given monies to groups run by the Muslim Brotherhood here in America and around the world will be placed under scrutiny. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is just one organization that will see their Saudi money dry up as a result if this is enforced.


0 372
lois lerner testimony

WASHINGTON, March 5, 2014 — Lois Lerner testified before a House committee regarding the allegation that the IRS is targeting conservative political groups. Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) opened the meeting by informing Ms. Lerner of some events that have happened since the start of the investigation.

Issa stated that, “On May 22, 2013, Ms. Lerner made a voluntary statement under oath to this committee in which she stated, ‘I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations.’” She then proceeded to invoke her 5th Amendment not to incriminate herself.

Issa referred to Rep. Trey Gowdy’s statement to the committee that day, in which he stated that Ms. Lerner had waived her right to invoke the 5th Amendment because she had given a voluntary statement professing her innocence. Chairman Issa temporarily dismissed Ms. Lerner to consider if she had indeed waived her 5th Amendment rights.

Rep. Issa stated he had issued three subpoenas, and to date the IRS is still withholding some of Ms. Lerner’s emails relevant to the purpose of the investigation. On May 22, 2013, the committee rejected Ms. Lerner’s claim of 5th Amendment privilege based on her waiver of those rights on that same date.

Chairman Issa stated before Ms. Lerner testified that if she continued refusing to answer, she could be held in contempt of Congress and may be detained.

Lois Lerner, the former Director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS, took the stand only to plead her right not to incriminate herself under the 5th Amendment.

Some of the questions asked by Chairman Issa which Lois Lerner refused to answer:

In an email, “you stated the Tea Party are very dangerous.  Why would you say the Tea Party cases are “very dangerous?”

Mrs. Lerner was questioned about an email in which she referred to a need to be cautious regarding her orders on how to investigate Tea Party groups.

Ms. Lerner was asked, “Why did you order Tea Party cases to go through a multi-tier review?”

After a few more questions which Ms. Lerner refused to answer by invoking her 5th Amendment rights, Chairman Issa declared the meeting closed. At this time, Congressman Cummings tried to make a political speech in favor of Ms. Lerner under the guise of calling for a procedural question. Chairman Issa had Cummings’ microphone disconnected as the meeting was adjourned.


1 473

President Obama added Robert Malley once more to his staff and, in so doing, he gave a statement of support to the Hamas, an entity that was declared a terrorist group under President Clinton. Robert Malley’s one claim to fame is a public statement in support of Hamas against our ally Israel. But, that is not what he should be remembered for.

In 2008 just before the election it was revealed that candidate Barack Hussein Obama had communicated with the Hamas. This event was first publicized by Hamas leader, Ahmad Yousef, and later translated into Hebrew and English on November 11, 2008 on Ynet News.  Ahmad Yousef claimed:

We were in contact with a number of Obama’s aides through the Internet, and later met with some of them in Gaza, but they advised us not to come out with any statements, as they may have a negative effect on his election campaign and be used by Republican candidate John McCain (to attack Obama),” Yousuf said in an interview with London-based Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat, published Tuesday.

Under Executive Order 13224 passed by President George W. Bush on Sept. 23, 2001, associating with Hamas made you susceptible to have your accounts frozen. Considering that this communication appeared to be favorable to Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, it is strange that no action was taken to freeze candidate Obama’s funds and assets.

Those who feign surprise at President Obama’s approval of Robert Malley are ignoring who sent him to meet with the Hamas in the first place. These same people are ignoring that Candidate Obama sent more than one representative according to the Hamas. Why isn’t someone asking who else Candidate Obama sent to meet with the Hamas?

While associating with the Hamas is illegal under federal law, the parent organization of the Hamas is openly operating in the White House, even after one of our allies declared it a terrorist group. That group is the Muslim Brotherhood.

White House logs document regular visits by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is most likely that because of Michelle Malkin’s work on this, the White House logs are not as transparent as they were when she wrote her first article on this in 2012.

Are presidents future, present and past above the law?  We must ask if Executive Order 13224 prevents everyone, including the president, from associating with terrorists.

3 552

As the world becomes smaller, colleges, universities and institutions of higher education become places where students get their first glimpse of the world. Part of this is because places of higher education recruit the world to their doorstep. It isn’t unusual to find people from 10 different countries or more on any college campus.

In acknowledging this simple fact, we acknowledge that institutions are turning their mission of educating people from a local mission to a global objective. I have been present when Admissions Officers have openly bragged about how far and wide the reach of their college is, and rightly so. All of this is good. Reaching the world, teaching the world, bringing education into the world is an honorable mission.

But, in seeking to educate students in a global way, do institutions of higher learning have obligations to those students who are from other countries? First and foremost do they have an obligation to provide a safe environment? The simple answer is, yes. Colleges around the world have hired security guards, computer technicians in charge of network security and have expanded into teaching and training staff to be culturally sensitive.

So, do places of higher learning have an obligation to warn students if they have an entity on their campus that is tied to a group banned by a prospective student’s country? Are they obligated to warn a potential student with something like, “Your country does not allow this or that and we have that here”?

Now, what is there that needs labeling?

On December 25th of 2013 the Egyptian government formally declared the Muslim Brotherhood to be a terrorist group, criminalizing all its activities. You are probably thinking so what. If you are, you are also probably unaware that the Muslim Brotherhood has been officially operating in the USA since 1963 on college campuses. The Muslim Brotherhood has formally acknowledged the group that started it all here in the United States. That group just celebrated a 50th anniversary.

Simply put, does a college have an obligation to warn the student body if a group on campus has known connections to the Muslim Brotherhood? When your college is contacted by an Egyptian, is the Admissions Officer ethically and legally bound under law to warn the potential student a group exists at the college that government of Egypt has technically labeled as criminal? This is not about religious freedom or freedom of speech. It is a question that must be asked and answered to protect the futures of students from Egypt who choose to study in the USA.

Now for the name of the group. The Muslim Students’ Association (MSA) was formerly claimed by the Muslim Brotherhood in their 1991 Explanatory Memorandum. According to the Muslim Students Association there are 750 groups including affiliates in North American colleges. That memorandum included a declaration that the group is engaged in the following:

‘civilization jihadist process,’ and all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated…

Academicians truly have no excuse for not knowing about this connection of the Muslim Student Association with Muslim Brotherhood. It has been documented extensively since the Chicago Tribune first exposed the connection in 2004. FBI records document their close observations of MSA also and their comments and filings on the topic are now publicly available. Academicians have no right to claim ignorance, especially after nine years of the group being exposed in the media and the federal court system.

But let’s get back to the original question and reword it to fit this specific situation. Is a college admissions officer under an ethical requirement to inform potential Egyptian students that their college hosts or allows a Muslim Student Association, which is affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood, the very group that the government of Egypt has declared to be terrorists?

Some colleges might find they have to give an additional warning. What could be worse than simply informing a potential student of the MSA? Simply put, it is that the college may finance the activities of the group that has a terrorist affiliation according to the government of Egypt. Some colleges have allowed their lack of understanding of this group to fool them into being embarrassed after learning they paid for a speaker who encourages jihad, sharia and has even been named by the federal government for taking part in terrorist funding.

Now a responsible admissions officer may want to know whether the MSA is the only Muslim Brotherhood front group on college campuses? Sadly, the answer is, no. Two other prominent groups are on college campuses, the Muslim American Society (MAS), which according to the average Muslim, “everyone knows MAS is Brotherhood.” Then there is the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). IIIT according to the FBI in 1988, led the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.

This brings us to another level of discovery and asking questions. Is the college admissions officer under obligation to a potential Egyptian student to warn them that they have a professor on campus affiliated with a group that is known to be affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which the government of Egypt has declared a terrorist group?

If an admissions officer does not inform a potential student from Egypt of these things and they apply and come to the campus as a student, could there be a problem? Is the admissions officer somehow responsible if the lack of information leads to the student being denied the right to return to their home country, because they are seen as having been influenced by those who are members of a group that the Egyptian government has declared terrorists?

What if a college learns this information and then elects to order their admission counselors not to inform students? Can that college be deemed ethical? These are very important questions that must be answered today.


0 12
On Thursday, Glenn Beck broke his silence on a recent court order that would force the media mogul to reveal sources stemming from the...